Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 12 de 12
Filter
1.
J Invasive Cardiol ; 33(2): E71-E76, 2021 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1063668

ABSTRACT

In Spring 2020, the United States epicenter of COVID-19 was New York City, in which the borough of the Bronx was particularly affected. This Fall, there has been a resurgence of COVID-19 in Europe and the Midwestern United States. We describe our experience transforming our cardiac catheterization laboratories to accommodate an influx of COVID-19 patients so as to provide other hospitals with a potential blueprint. We transformed our pre/postprocedural patient care areas into COVID-19 intensive care and step-down units and maintained emergent invasive care for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction using existing space and personnel.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Cardiac Catheterization/methods , Cardiology Service, Hospital , Coronary Care Units , Critical Care , Infection Control , Laboratories, Hospital/organization & administration , Organizational Innovation , ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/therapy , Cardiology Service, Hospital/organization & administration , Cardiology Service, Hospital/trends , Coronary Care Units/methods , Coronary Care Units/organization & administration , Critical Care/methods , Critical Care/organization & administration , Critical Care/trends , Humans , Infection Control/methods , Infection Control/organization & administration , New York City/epidemiology , Patient Care Team/organization & administration , Perioperative Care/methods , SARS-CoV-2 , ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction/epidemiology , ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction/therapy
2.
J Appl Lab Med ; 6(2): 451-462, 2021 03 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-949471

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Patient surges beyond hospital capacity during the initial phase of the COVID-19 pandemic emphasized a need for clinical laboratories to prepare test processes to support future patient care. The objective of this study was to determine if current instrumentation in local hospital laboratories can accommodate the anticipated workload from COVID-19 infected patients in hospitals and a proposed field hospital in addition to testing for non-infected patients. METHODS: Simulation models predicted instrument throughput and turn-around-time for chemistry, ion-selective-electrode, and immunoassay tests using vendor-developed software with different workload scenarios. The expanded workload included tests from anticipated COVID patients in 2 local hospitals and a proposed field hospital with a COVID-specific test menu in addition to the pre-pandemic workload. RESULTS: Instrumentation throughput and turn-around time at each site was predicted. With additional COVID-patient beds in each hospital, the maximum throughput was approached with no impact on turnaround time. Addition of the field hospital workload led to significantly increased test turnaround times at each site. CONCLUSIONS: Simulation models depicted the analytic capacity and turn-around times for laboratory tests at each site and identified the laboratory best suited for field hospital laboratory support during the pandemic.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 Testing/instrumentation , COVID-19/diagnosis , Health Care Rationing/methods , Laboratories, Hospital/organization & administration , Pandemics/statistics & numerical data , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/virology , COVID-19 Testing/statistics & numerical data , COVID-19 Testing/trends , Clinical Laboratory Services/organization & administration , Clinical Laboratory Services/statistics & numerical data , Computer Simulation , Datasets as Topic , Forecasting/methods , Health Care Rationing/statistics & numerical data , Health Planning Technical Assistance , Hospital Bed Capacity/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Intensive Care Units/organization & administration , Intensive Care Units/statistics & numerical data , Intensive Care Units/trends , Laboratories, Hospital/supply & distribution , Laboratories, Hospital/trends , Models, Statistical , Reagent Kits, Diagnostic/supply & distribution , Reagent Kits, Diagnostic/trends , SARS-CoV-2/isolation & purification , Saskatchewan/epidemiology , Software , Time Factors , Workload/statistics & numerical data
3.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol ; 41(11): 1331-1334, 2020 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-899787

ABSTRACT

We describe a widespread laboratory surveillance program for severe acute respiratory coronavirus virus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) at an integrated medical campus that includes a tertiary-care center, a skilled nursing facility, a rehabilitation treatment center, and temporary shelter units. We identified 22 asymptomatic cases of SARS-CoV-2 and implemented infection control measures to prevent SARS-CoV-2 transmission in congregate settings.


Subject(s)
Asymptomatic Infections , Betacoronavirus/isolation & purification , Clinical Laboratory Techniques/methods , Coronavirus Infections/diagnosis , Delivery of Health Care, Integrated , Hospitalization , Infection Control/methods , Pneumonia, Viral/diagnosis , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , COVID-19 , COVID-19 Testing , California , Coronavirus Infections/prevention & control , Coronavirus Infections/transmission , Female , Humans , Infection Control/organization & administration , Laboratories, Hospital/organization & administration , Male , Middle Aged , Pandemics/prevention & control , Pneumonia, Viral/prevention & control , Pneumonia, Viral/transmission , SARS-CoV-2
4.
Biochem Med (Zagreb) ; 30(3): 030403, 2020 Oct 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-874945

ABSTRACT

To fight the virus SARS-CoV-2 spread to Europe from China and to give support to the collapsed public health system, the Spanish Health Authorities developed a field hospital located in the facilities of Madrid exhibition centre (IFEMA) to admit and treat patients diagnosed with SARS-CoV-2 infectious disease (COVID-19). The Department of Laboratory Medicine of La Paz University Hospital in Madrid (LMD-HULP) was designated to provide laboratory services. Due to the emergency, the IFEMA field hospital had to be prepared for patient admission in less than 1 week and the laboratory professionals had to collaborate in a multidisciplinary group to assure that resources were available to start on time. The LMD-HULP participated together with the managers in the design of the tests portfolio and the integration of the healthcare information systems (IS) (hospital IS, laboratory IS and POCT management system). Laboratorians developed a strategy to quickly train clinicians and nurses on test requests, sample collection procedures and management/handling of the POCT blood gas analyser both by written materials and training videos. The IFEMA´s preanalytical unit managed 3782 requests, and more than 11,000 samples from March 27th to April 30th. Furthermore, 1151 samples were measured by blood gas analysers. In conclusion, laboratory professionals must be resilient and have to respond timely in emergencies as this pandemic. The lab's personnel selection, design and monitoring indicators to maintain and further improve the quality and value of laboratory services is crucial to support medical decision making and provide better patient care.


Subject(s)
Betacoronavirus , Coronavirus Infections , Mobile Health Units/organization & administration , Pandemics , Pneumonia, Viral , COVID-19 , Cities , Clinical Laboratory Information Systems/organization & administration , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Delivery of Health Care , Health Services Needs and Demand , Hospital Bed Capacity , Hospital Information Systems/organization & administration , Hospitals, University/organization & administration , Humans , Laboratories, Hospital/organization & administration , Personnel, Hospital/education , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Point-of-Care Testing/organization & administration , Quality Assurance, Health Care/organization & administration , SARS-CoV-2 , Spain , Specimen Handling
5.
Isr Med Assoc J ; 22(10): 605-611, 2020 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-875264

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: There is limited clinical information on coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19) patients in Israel. OBJECTIVES: To describe the characteristics, outcomes, and potential associations of hospitalized COVID-19 patients in Israel. METHODS: We conducted a single-center, retrospective study of 58 consecutive laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 patients admitted to Laniado Hospital, Israel, between 14 March 2020 and 14 May 2020. Demographic, clinical, and laboratory data on admission were collected and analyzed, and the association to subsequent respiratory failure was assessed. RESULTS: Mean age of patients was 70.7 ± 16.9 years (53% males, 47% females.); 74% had at least one co-morbidity. Most patients were of Jewish Ashkenazi descent. During hospitalization 15 patients (mean age 78.18 ± 10.35 years); 80% male, 73% Sephardi descent developed respiratory failure rates of 60% occurring on average 10.6 days following intubation. Laboratory tests at admission displayed a significant increase in C-reactive protein (CRP) and creatine kinase (CK) and a decrease in absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) in patients who eventually developed respiratory failure (163.97 mg/L, 340.87 IU/L, 0.886 K/µl vs. 50.01 mg/L and 123.56 IU/L, 1.28 K/µl, respectively). Multivariate logistic analysis revealed an integrated parameter of CRP, CK, and ALC highly correlated with respiratory failure. Receiver operating characteristic curve revealed the area under the curve of CRP, CK, and ALC and the integrated parameter to be 0.910, 0.784, and 0.754, respectively. CRP was the strongest predictor to correlate with respiratory failure. CONCLUSIONS: CRP, CK, and ALC levels on admission could possibly be used to detect high-risk patients prone to develop respiratory failure.


Subject(s)
Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Disease Progression , Emergency Service, Hospital/statistics & numerical data , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Respiratory Insufficiency/mortality , Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome/diagnosis , Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome/therapy , Academic Medical Centers , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , C-Reactive Protein/analysis , COVID-19 , Cohort Studies , Coronavirus Infections/prevention & control , Creatine Kinase/analysis , Diagnostic Tests, Routine/methods , Female , Humans , Israel , Laboratories, Hospital/organization & administration , Logistic Models , Lymphocyte Count , Male , Middle Aged , Multivariate Analysis , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Pandemics/prevention & control , Pandemics/statistics & numerical data , Pneumonia, Viral/prevention & control , ROC Curve , Respiratory Insufficiency/diagnosis , Respiratory Insufficiency/therapy , Retrospective Studies , Survival Rate
8.
Cancer Cytopathol ; 128(12): 895-904, 2020 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-757787

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The purpose of the current study was to examine the impact of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) on various aspects of cytology practice in the Asia-Pacific region. METHODS: An online questionnaire was distributed to cytopathology laboratories in 24 Asia-Pacific countries to explore the impact of restrictive measures on access to health care, use of general and personal protective equipment (PPE), and changes in cytology workflow and workload from February to April 2020. RESULTS: A total of 167 cytopathology laboratories from 24 countries responded to the survey; the majority reported that restrictive measures that limited the accessibility of health care services had been implemented in their cities and/or countries (80.8%) and their hospitals (83.8%). The respondents noted that COVID-19 had an impact on the cytologic workflow as well as the workload. Approximately one-half of the participants reported the implementation of new biosafety protocols (54.5%) as well as improvements in laboratory facilities (47.3%). Rearrangement or redeployment of the workforce was reported in 53.3% and 34.1% of laboratories, respectively. The majority of the respondents reported a significant reduction (>10%) in caseload associated with both gynecological (82.0%) and nongynecological specimens (78.4%). Most laboratories reported no significant change in the malignancy rates of both gynecological (67.7%) and nongynecological specimens (58.7%) compared with the same period in 2019. CONCLUSIONS: The results of the survey demonstrated that the COVID-19 pandemic resulted in a significant reduction in the number of cytology specimens examined along with the need to implement new biosafety protocols. These findings underscore the need for the worldwide standardization of biosafety protocols and cytology practice.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/prevention & control , Communicable Disease Control/standards , Infectious Disease Transmission, Patient-to-Professional/prevention & control , Laboratories, Hospital/organization & administration , Pathology, Clinical/organization & administration , Asia , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/transmission , COVID-19/virology , Communicable Disease Control/instrumentation , Health Workforce/organization & administration , Health Workforce/standards , Health Workforce/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Laboratories, Hospital/standards , Laboratories, Hospital/statistics & numerical data , Pacific States , Pandemics/prevention & control , Pathology, Clinical/standards , Pathology, Clinical/statistics & numerical data , Personal Protective Equipment/standards , SARS-CoV-2/pathogenicity , Surveys and Questionnaires/statistics & numerical data , Workload/statistics & numerical data
10.
Clin Chem Lab Med ; 58(9): 1441-1449, 2020 08 27.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-605894

ABSTRACT

Objectives: The International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (IFCC) Task Force on COVID-19 conducted a global survey to understand how biochemistry laboratories manage the operational challenges during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Materials and methods: An electronic survey was distributed globally to record the operational considerations to mitigate biosafety risks in the laboratory. Additionally, the laboratories were asked to indicate the operational challenges they faced. Results: A total of 1210 valid submissions were included in this analysis. Most of the survey participants worked in hospital laboratories. Around 15% of laboratories restricted certain tests on patients with clinically suspected or confirmed COVID-19 over biosafety concerns. Just over 10% of the laboratories had to restrict their test menu or services due to resource constraints. Approximately a third of laboratories performed temperature monitoring, while two thirds of laboratories increased the frequency of disinfection. Just less than 50% of the laboratories split their teams. The greatest reported challenge faced by laboratories during the COVID-19 pandemic is securing sufficient supplies of personal protective equipment (PPE), analytical equipment, including those used at the point of care, as well as reagents, consumables and other laboratory materials. This was followed by having inadequate staff, managing their morale, anxiety and deployment. Conclusions: The restriction of tests and services may have undesirable clinical consequences as clinicians are deprived of important information to deliver appropriate care to their patients. Staff rostering and biosafety concerns require longer-term solutions as they are crucial for the continued operation of the laboratory during what may well be a prolonged pandemic.


Subject(s)
Betacoronavirus , Coronavirus Infections/prevention & control , Laboratories, Hospital/organization & administration , Laboratories, Hospital/statistics & numerical data , Pandemics/prevention & control , Pneumonia, Viral/prevention & control , Surveys and Questionnaires , Body Temperature , COVID-19 , Containment of Biohazards/statistics & numerical data , Disease Outbreaks , Disinfection/statistics & numerical data , Health Workforce/organization & administration , Health Workforce/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Monitoring, Physiologic/statistics & numerical data , Personal Protective Equipment/statistics & numerical data , Risk Management/statistics & numerical data , SARS-CoV-2
11.
J Am Med Inform Assoc ; 27(8): 1293-1299, 2020 08 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-141775

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The study sought to describe the development, implementation, and requirements of laboratory information system (LIS) functionality to manage test ordering, registration, sample flow, and result reporting during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Our large (>12 000 000 tests/y) academic hospital laboratory is the Belgian National Reference Center for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) testing. We have performed a moving total of >25 000 SARS-CoV-2 polymerase chain reaction tests in parallel to standard routine testing since the start of the outbreak. A LIS implementation team dedicated to develop tools to remove the bottlenecks, primarily situated in the pre- and postanalytical phases, was established early in the crisis. RESULTS: We outline the design, implementation, and requirements of LIS functionality related to managing increased test demand during the COVID-19 crisis, including tools for test ordering, standardized order sets integrated into a computerized provider order entry module, notifications on shipping requirements, automated triaging based on digital metadata forms, and the establishment of databases with contact details of other laboratories and primary care physicians to enable automated reporting. We also describe our approach to data mining and reporting of actionable daily summary statistics to governing bodies and other policymakers. CONCLUSIONS: Rapidly developed, agile extendable LIS functionality and its meaningful use alleviates the administrative burden on laboratory personnel and improves turnaround time of SARS-CoV-2 testing. It will be important to maintain an environment that is conducive for the rapid adoption of meaningful LIS tools after the COVID-19 crisis.


Subject(s)
Clinical Laboratory Information Systems , Clinical Laboratory Techniques , Coronavirus Infections/diagnosis , Laboratories, Hospital/organization & administration , Medical Order Entry Systems , Pneumonia, Viral/diagnosis , Academic Medical Centers , Belgium , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , COVID-19 Testing , Change Management , Evidence-Based Medicine , Humans , Meaningful Use , Pandemics , SARS-CoV-2
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL